MICHELANGELO Buonarroti - b. 1475 Caprese, d. 1564 Roma - WGA

MICHELANGELO Buonarroti

(b. 1475 Caprese, d. 1564 Roma)

Michelangelo (full name: Michelangelo di Lodovico Buonarroti Simoni) was born at Caprese, a village in Florentine territory, where his father, named Ludovico Buonarroti Simoni was the resident magistrate. A few weeks after Michelangelo’s birth the family returned to Florence, and, in 1488, after overcoming parental opposition he was formally apprenticed to Domenico Ghirlandaio for a term of three years. Later in life Michelangelo tried to suppress this fact, probably to make it seem that he had never had an ordinary workshop training; for it was he more than anyone else who introduced the idea of the ‘Fine Arts’ having no connection with the craft that painting had always previously been. His stay in the Ghirlandaio shop must also have coincided with his beginning to work as a sculptor in the Medici Garden, where antiques from their collection were looked after by Bertoldo. Although this connection drew him into the Medici circle as a familiar, the account by Vasari of an established ‘school’ is now discredited. It must, however, have been Ghirlandaio who taught him the elements of fresco technique, and it was probably also in that shop that he made his drawings after the great Florentine masters of the past (copies after Giotto and Masaccio; now in the Louvre, in Munich, and in Vienna). Michelangelo produced at least two relief sculptures by the time he was 16 years old, the Battle of the Centaurs and the Madonna of the Stairs (both 1489-92, Casa Buonarroti, Florence), which show that he had achieved a personal style at a very early age.

In 1492, Lorenzo de’ Medici died. Michelangelo then studied anatomy with the help of the Prior of the Hospital of Sto Spirito, for whom he appears to have carved a wooden crucifix for the high altar. A wooden crucifix found there (now in the Casa Buonarroti) has been attributed to him by some scholars. The next few years were marked by the expulsion of the Medici and the gloomy Theocracy set up under Savonarola, but Michelangelo avoided the worst of the crisis by going to Bologna and, in 1496, to Rome. He settled for a time in Bologna, where in 1494 and 1495 he executed several marble statuettes for the Arca (Shrine) di San Domenico in the Church of San Domenico.

In Rome he carved the first of his major works, the Bacchus (Florence, Bargello) and the St Peter’s Pietà, which was completed by the turn of the century. It is highly finished and shows that he had already mastered anatomy and the disposition of drapery, but above all it shows that he had solved the problem of the representation of a full-grown man stretched out nearly horizontally on the lap of a woman, the whole being contained in a pyramidal shape.

The Pietà made his name and he returned to Florence in 1501 as a famous sculptor, remaining there until 1505. During these years he was extremely active, carving the gigantic David (1501-4, now in the Accademia), the Bruges Madonna (Bruges, Notre Dame), and beginning the series of the Twelve Apostles for the Cathedral which was commissioned in 1503 but never completed (the St Matthew now in the Accademia is the only one which was even blocked in). At about this time he painted the Doni Tondo of the Holy Family with St John the Baptist (Florence, Uffizi) and made the two marble tondi of the Madonna and Child (Florence, Bargello; London, Royal Academy).

After the completion of the David in 1504 he began to work on the cartoon of a huge fresco in the Council Hall of the new Florentine Republic, as a pendant to the one already commissioned from Leonardo da Vinci. Both remained unfinished and the grandiose project of employing the two greatest living artists on the decoration of the Town Hall of their native city came to nothing. Of Michelangelo’s fresco, which was to represent the Battle of Cascina, an incident in the Pisan War, we now have a few studies by him and copies of a fragment of the whole full-scale cartoon which once existed (the best copy is the painting in Lord Leicester’s Collection, Holkham, Norfolk). The cartoon, which is known as the Bathers, was for many years the resort of every young artist in Florence and, by its exclusive stress on the nude human body as a sufficient vehicle for the expression of alt emotions which the painter can depict, had an enormous influence on the subsequent development of Italian art - especially Mannerism - and therefore on European art as a whole. This influence is more readily detectable in his next major work, the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel. In fact, however, the Battle of Cascina was left incomplete because the Signoria of Florence found it expedient to comply with a request from the masterful Pope Julius II, who was anxious to have a fitting tomb made in his lifetime.

The Julius Monument was, in Michelangelo’s own view, the Tragedy of the Tomb. This was partly because Michelangelo and Julius had the same ardent temperament - they admired each other greatly - and very soon quarrelled, and partly because after the death of Julius in 1513, Michelangelo was under constant pressure from successive Popes to abandon his contractual obligations and work for them while equally under pressure from the heirs of Julius, who even went so far as to accuse him of embezzlement. The original project for a vast free-standing tomb with forty figures was substantially reduced by a second contract (1513), drawn up after Julius’s death; under this contract the Moses, which is the major figure on the extant tomb, was prepared as a subsidiary figure. Two others, the Slaves in the Louvre, were made under this contract but were subsequently abandoned. The third contract (1516) was followed by a fourth (1532), and a fifth and final one in 1542, under the terms of which the present miserably mutilated version of the original conception was carried out by assistants, under Michelangelo’s supervision, in S. Pietro in Vincoli (Julius’s titular church) in 1545. Michelangelo was then 70 and had spent nearly forty years on the tomb.

Meanwhile, the original quarrel of 1506 with Julius was made up and Michelangelo executed a colossal bronze statue of the Pope as an admonition to the recently conquered Bolognese (who destroyed it as soon as they could, in 1511). In 1508, back in Rome, he began his most important work, the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel in the Vatican for Julius, who, as usual, was impatient to see it finished. Dissatisfied with the normal working methods and with the abilities of the assistants he had engaged, Michelangelo determined to execute the whole of this vast work virtually alone. Working under appalling difficulties (amusingly described in one of his own poems), most of the time leaning backwards and never able to get far enough away from the ceiling to be able to see what he was doing, he completed the first half (the part nearer to the door) in 1510. The whole enormous undertaking was completed in 1512, Michelangelo being by then so practised that he was able to execute the second half more rapidly and freely. It was at once recognized as a supreme work of art, even at the moment when Raphael was also at work in the Vatican Stanze. From then on Michelangelo was universally regarded as the greatest living artist, although he was then only 37 and this was in the lifetimes of Leonardo and Raphael (who was even younger). From this moment, too, dates the idea of the artist as in some sense a superhuman being, set apart from ordinary men, and for the first time it was possible to use the phrase ‘il divino Michelangelo’ without seeming merely blasphemous.

The Sistine Ceiling is a shallow barrel vault divided up by painted architecture into a series of alternating large and small panels which appear to be open to the sky. These are the Histories. Each of the smaller panels is surrounded by four figures of nude youths - the Slaves, or Ignudi - who are represented as seated on the architectural frame and who are not of the same order of reality as the figures in the Histories, since their system of perspective is different. Below them are the Prophets and Sibyls, and still lower, the figures of the Ancestors of Christ. The whole ceiling completes the chapel decoration by representing life on earth before the Law: on the walls is an earlier cycle of frescoes, painted in 1481-82, representing the Life of Moses (i.e. the Old Dispensation) and the Life of Christ (the New Dispensation). The Histories begin over the altar and work away from it (though they were painted in the reverse direction): the first scene represents God alone, in the Primal Act of Creation, and the story continues through the rest of the Creation to the Fall, the Flood, and the Drunkenness of Noah, representing the human soul at its furthest from God. The whole conception owes much to the Neoplatonic philosophy current in Michelangelo’s youth in Florence, perhaps most in the idea of the Ignudi, perfect human beauty, on the level below the Divine story. Below them come the Old Testament Prophets and the Seers of the ancient world who foretold the coming of Christ; while the four corners have scenes from the Old Testament representing Salvation. The Prophet Jonah is above the altar, since his three days in the whale were held to prefigure the Resurrection. On the lowest parts - and very freely painted - are the human families who were the Ancestors of Christ. There can be no doubt that the splendour of the conception and the size of the task distracted Michelangelo from the Tomb, but he at once returned to it as soon as the ceiling was finished, from 1513 to 1516, when he returned to Florence to work for the Medici. (For details on the frescoes in the Sistine Chapel take a guided tour.)

His new master was Pope Leo X, the younger son of Lorenzo de Medici, who had known Michelangelo from boyhood; he now commissioned him to complete the façade of San Lorenzo, the family church in Florence. Michelangelo wasted four years on this and it came to nothing. In 1520 he began planning the Medici Chapel, a funerary chapel in honour of four of the Medici - two of them by no means the most glorious of their family. The chapel is attached to San Lorenzo. Leo X died in 1521 and it was not until after the accession of another Medici Pope, Clement VII, in 1523 that the project was resumed. Work began in earnest in 1524 and at the same time he was commissioned to design the Laurenziana Library in the cloister of the same church. Both these buildings are turning-points in architectural history, but the sculptural decoration of the chapel (an integral part of the architecture) was never completed, although the figures of Giuliano and Lorenzo de’ Medici set over their tombs, eternally symbolizing the Active and the Contemplative Life, above the symbols of Time and Mortality - Day and Night, Dawn and Dusk - are among his finest creations. The unfinished Madonna was meant to be the focal point of the chapel.

In 1527, the Medici were again expelled from Florence, and Michelangelo, who was politically a Republican in spite of his close ties with the Medici, took an active part in the 1527-29 war against the Medici up to the capitulation in 1530 (although in a moment of panic he had fled in 1529) and supervised Florentine fortifications. During the months of confusion and disorder in Florence, when he was proscribed for his participation in the struggle, it would appear that he was hidden by the Prior of San Lorenzo. A number of drawings on the walls of a concealed crypt under the Medici Chapel have been attributed to him, and ascribed to this period. After the reinstatement of the Medici he was pardoned, and set to work once more on the Chapel which was to glorify them until, in 1534, he left Florence and settled in Rome for the thirty years remaining to him.

He was at once commissioned to paint his next great work, the Last Judgment on the altar wall of the Sistine Chapel, which affords the strongest possible contrast with his own Ceiling. He began work on it in 1536. In the interval there had been the Sack of Rome and the Reformation, and the confident humanism and Christian Neoplatonism of the Ceiling had curdled into the personal pessimism and despondency of the Judgment. The very choice of subject is indicative of the new mood, as is the curious fact that the mouth of Hell gapes over the altar itself where, during services, stands a crucifix symbolizing Christ standing between Man and Doom. It was unveiled in 1541 and caused a sensation equalled only by his own work of thirty years earlier, and was the only work by him to be as much reviled as praised, and only narrowly to escape destruction, though it did not escape the mutilation of having many of the nude figures ‘clothed’ after his death. Most of the ideas of Mannerism are traceable implicitly or explicitly in the Judgment and, more than ever, it served to imprint the idea that the scope of painting is strictly limited to the exploitation of the nude, preferably in foreshortened - and therefore difficult - poses. Paul III, who had commissioned the Judgment, immediately commissioned two more frescoes for his own chapel, the Cappella Paolina; these were begun in 1542 and completed in 1550. They represent the Conversion of St Paul and the Crucifixion of St Peter.

Michelangelo was now 75 years old. Earlier, in 1538-39, plans were under way for the remodeling of the buildings surrounding the Campidoglio (Capitol) on the Capitoline Hill, the civic and political heart of the city of Rome. Although Michelangelo’s program was not carried out until the late 1550s and not finished until the 17th century, he designed the Campidoglio around an oval shape, with the famous antique bronze equestrian statue of the Roman emperor Marcus Aurelius in the center. For the Palazzo dei Conservatori he brought a new unity to the public building façade, at the same time that he preserved traditional Roman monumentality. However, since 1546 he had been increasingly active as an architect; in particular, he was Chief Architect to St Peter’s and was doing more there than had been done for thirty years. This was the greatest architectural undertaking in Christendom, and Michelangelo did it, as he did all his late works, solely for the glory of God.

In his last years he made a number of drawings of the Crucifixion, wrote much of his finest poetry, and carved the Pietà (now in Florence Cathedral Museum) which was originally intended for his own tomb, as well as the nearly abstract Rondanini Pietà (Milan, Castello). This last work, in which the very forms of the Dead Christ actually merge with those of His Mother, is charged with an emotional intensity which contemporaries recognized as Michelangelo’s ‘terribilità’. He was working on it to within a few days of his death, in his 89th year, on 18 February 1564. There is a whole world of difference between it and the ‘beautiful’ Pietà in St Peter’s, carved some sixty-five years earlier.

Unlike any previous artist, Michelangelo was the subject of two biographies in his own lifetime. The first of these was by Vasari, who concluded the first (1550) edition of his ‘Vite’ with the Life of one living artist, Michelangelo. In 1553 there appeared a ‘Life of Michelangelo’ by his pupil Ascanio Condivi (English translations 1903, 1976 and 1987); this is really almost an autobiography, promoted by Michelangelo to correct some errors of Vasari and to shift the emphasis in what Michelangelo regarded as a more desirable direction. Vasari, however, became more and more friendly with Michelangelo and was also his most devoted and articulate admirer, so that the very long Life which appears in Vasari’s second edition (1568), after Michelangelo’s death, gives us the most complete biography of any artist up to that time and is a trustworthy guide to the feelings of contemporaries about the man who can lay claim to be the greatest sculptor, painter and draughtsman that has ever lived, as well as one of the greatest architects and poets. He is the archetype of genius.

Pure fresco was his preferred painting technique; he despised oil-painting, though the now authenticated unfinished Entombment (London, National Gallery) is in oil over a tempera underpainting. The Doni Tondo is in tempera. In sculpture, his usual method was to outline his figure on the front of the block and, as he himself wrote, to ‘liberate the figure imprisoned in the marble’, by working steadily inwards, with perhaps a few more finished details. Occasionally he made drawings for parts of a figure, and a few small wax models survive as well as one large one, made for the guidance of assistants working on the Medici Chapel figures. The four abandoned Slaves intended for a later version of the Julius Tomb (Florence, Accademia) and the two marble tondi left unfinished in 1505 provide fine examples of his direct carving technique and his consistent use of various sizes of claw chisel. No modelli exist for any paintings or frescoes, and only one cartoon (London, British Museum), made to help Condivi, has survived.

Apart from the works mentioned above, there are others in Florence ( Bargello, Santo Spirito - the house of his family, which contains relics of him - and Palazzo della Signoria) and in Siena, Rome (Santa Maria sopra Minerva), and St Petersburg ( The Hermitage). There are also some 500 drawings by him, the majority of which are in Windsor (Royal Collection), Florence (Casa Buonarroti), and Paris.

"Compositional Sketch for "Judith and Holofernes"
"Compositional Sketch for "Judith and Holofernes" by

"Compositional Sketch for "Judith and Holofernes"

The verso of this sheet represents a compositional sketch for the depiction of Judith and Holofernes. It is an early study for Michelangelo’s pendentive fresco in the Sistine Chapel.

The recto of the sheet contains a study of a soldier fastening his comrade’s armour at the shoulder.

A Man Lifting a Boar onto his Shoulder (verso)
A Man Lifting a Boar onto his Shoulder (verso) by

A Man Lifting a Boar onto his Shoulder (verso)

This drawing probably depicts Hercules and the Erymanthian Boar, although the attributes of Hercules are missing.

Abraham - Isaac - Jacob - Judah
Abraham - Isaac - Jacob - Judah by

Abraham - Isaac - Jacob - Judah

In the lunettes situated at the top of the altar wall, Michelangelo painted the first two groups of ancestors of Christ according to the sequence of the Gospel of St Matthew: Abraham-Isaac-Jacob-Judah and Perez-Hezron-Ram. The two frescoes were destroyed when the artist decided to extend the painting of the Last Judgment to the whole wall. However, they are shown in two drawings reproducing the whole vault (now in the collections of Windsor castle and the Ashmolean Museum, Oxford) and in two engravings by Adamo Ghisi.

Achim - Eliud
Achim - Eliud by

Achim - Eliud

“Zadok begat Achim. Achim begat Eliud. Eliud begat Eliazar.” (Matthew 1:14-15)

This is the first lunette on the south wall.

The identity of the figures is not certain, and it is not possible to establish which of the two, Achim or Eliud, is the old man with a child next to him on the left, and which the child held by his mother on the right.

The elaborate pose of the old man is very carefully constructed with vigorous twisting of the limbs. The sculptural effect of the figure is largely due to the prominence of the knees and the crossed arms, with the right elbow projecting notably and the hands folded in toward the body. This effect is heightened by the magnificent arrangement of the drapery, especially on the left knee and over the edge of the stone seat.

The meditative attitude of the old man is counterbalanced on the other side of the lunette by the fascinating spontaneity of the woman’s gestures. Turning toward her child, she stretches out her arm to take some food from a plate placed on a stool in the foreground.

Achim - Eliud (detail)
Achim - Eliud (detail) by

Achim - Eliud (detail)

The detail shows the head of the old man.

Achim - Eliud (detail)
Achim - Eliud (detail) by

Achim - Eliud (detail)

Turning toward her child, the young woman stretches out her arm to take some food from a plate placed on a stool in the foreground.

Aeneas with a Boy (recto)
Aeneas with a Boy (recto) by

Aeneas with a Boy (recto)

Michelangelo made preparatory drawings for a painting depicting Aeneas taking off his clothes to lie with Dido when he is surprised by Mercury. He provided them to his friend, Daniele da Volterra, who elaborated the details or developed them further independently. The painting is lost but the composition is known from a copy.

On the recto of the present sheet Michelangelo depicts Aeneas and the boy who helps him taking off his clothes. On the verso the main motif is a study of a prophet or evangelist. On both sides of the sheet the artist drew various architectural studies.

Allegorical figure
Allegorical figure by

Allegorical figure

One of the drawings which Vasari referred to as “The Divine Heads”. Michelangelo painted portraits of women as well as men, though in both cases his models were chosen among his “garzoni” (boys).

Amminadab
Amminadab by

Amminadab

” Abraham begat Isaac. Isaac begat7 Jacob. Jacob begat Judah and his brothers. Judah begat Phares and Serah by Thamar. Phares begat Esron. Esron begat Aram. Aram begat Amminadab. Amminadab begat Nahshon.” (Matthew 1:2-4)

There are only two figures, both of young people, in the lunette of Amminadab, the prince of the Levites, opposite the one of Nahshon. The man on the left is depicted frontally, sitting bolt upright with his feet together, his forearms resting on his legs, and his hands tightly intertwined, a gesture that seems to betray great interior tension, as does the expression on his face, with its strongly pronounced lineaments under wiry hair held down with a white scarf. He is wearing a pale green cloak with reddish-orange shadows and tight gray-blue hose. From his ears hang two metal earrings of different shapes.

Like that of Amminadab, and many other figures in the lunettes painted at the end of the second phase of the frescoing of the vault, the position of the woman is uncommon, and was probably drawn from life. She is depicted seated, but turning around, her limbs twisted, and busy drawing an ivory comb through the long blond hair hanging down from her inclined head. The interplay of light and shade lends remarkable vivacity and immediacy to the figure. It is rendered with notable variations in tone on her face, her arm raised in front of her, her hand with the comb, and the foreshortened one holding up her hair, and also over the whole surface of the long rose red tunic and the white cloth spread over her knees.

Amminadab (detail)
Amminadab (detail) by

Amminadab (detail)

The man on the left is depicted frontally, sitting bolt upright with his feet together, his forearms resting on his legs, and his hands tightly intertwined, a gesture that seems to betray great interior tension, as does the expression on his face, with its strongly pronounced lineaments under wiry hair held down with a white scarf. He is wearing a pale green cloak with reddish-orange shadows and tight gray-blue hose. From his ears hang two metal earrings of different shapes.

Amminadab (detail)
Amminadab (detail) by

Amminadab (detail)

Like that of Amminadab, and many other figures in the lunettes painted at the end of the second phase of the frescoing of the vault, the position of the woman is uncommon, and was probably drawn from life. She is depicted seated, but turning around, her limbs twisted, and busy drawing an ivory comb through the long blond hair hanging down from her inclined head. The interplay of light and shade lends remarkable vivacity and immediacy to the figure. It is rendered with notable variations in tone on her face, her arm raised in front of her, her hand with the comb, and the foreshortened one holding up her hair, and also over the whole surface of the long rose red tunic and the white cloth spread over her knees.

Ancestors of Christ: figures
Ancestors of Christ: figures by

Ancestors of Christ: figures

The figures are in the trianglar spandrel in the second bay between Joel and the Erythraean Sibyl. The spandrel is above the Zerubbabel-Abiud-Eliakim lunette.

It is generally believed that Zerubbabel is depicted here, together with his parents and a brother.

Ancestors of Christ: figures
Ancestors of Christ: figures by

Ancestors of Christ: figures

The figures are in the trianglar spandrel in the second bay between Joel and the Erythraean Sibyl. The spandrel is above the Zerubbabel-Abiud-Eliakim lunette.

It is generally believed that Zerubbabel is depicted here, together with his parents and a brother.

Ancestors of Christ: figures
Ancestors of Christ: figures by

Ancestors of Christ: figures

The figures are in the triangular spandrel in the second bay between Isaiah and the Delphic Sibyl, over the Josiah-Jechoniah-Shealtiel lunette.

The figures probably represent Jechoniah’s family with their son Shealtiel. The poses of the figures, together with the nocturnal atmosphere, bring to mind the definition that St Paul gave of the ancestors of Christ as “pilgrims” and strangers on earth”, on their way toward the promised land.

Ancestors of Christ: figures
Ancestors of Christ: figures by

Ancestors of Christ: figures

The figures are in the triangular spandrel in the second bay between Isaiah and the Delphic Sibyl, over the Josiah-Jechoniah-Shealtiel lunette.

The figures probably represent Jechoniah’s family with their son Shealtiel. The poses of the figures, together with the nocturnal atmosphere, bring to mind the definition that St Paul gave of the ancestors of Christ as “pilgrims” and strangers on earth”, on their way toward the promised land.

Ancestors of Christ: figures
Ancestors of Christ: figures by

Ancestors of Christ: figures

The figures are in the triangular spandrel in the fourth bay between the Erythraean Sibyl and Ezekiel. This spandrel is over the Uzziah-Jotham-Ahaz lunette.

Together with the child leaning toward her breast, the woman kneeling in the foreground forms a pyramidal group with the axis slightly to the right of that of the triangle constituted by the spandrel. The space on the left is occupied a little further back by another seated figure who also clasps a child, while on the right there is a foreshortened representation of a large sack. The colours of the clothes, especially the woman’s pale pink mantle with iridescent green and yellow shadows, stand out against the gloomy, nocturnal background.

The figures are identified as Uzziah, the future king of Juda, his mother, his father Jotham, and one of his brothers.

Ancestors of Christ: figures
Ancestors of Christ: figures by

Ancestors of Christ: figures

The figures are in the triangular spandrel in the fourth bay between the Cumaean Sibyl and Isaiah. The spandrel is situated over the Hezekiah-Manasseh-Amon lunette.

All of the space in the foreground is occupied by the figure in profile of the woman seated on the ground. Behind her, there is the figure of a child and the head of an old man emerging from the shadows. A bright light, however, gives prominence to the woman’s green mantle with iridescent yellow shadows, her white shirt, and the violet scarf falling from her shoulder along her right arm, heightening the contrast with the figures behind.

In accordance with the lunette below, the figures represent Hezekiah as a child with his mother and his father Ahaz.

Ancestors of Christ: figures
Ancestors of Christ: figures by

Ancestors of Christ: figures

The figures are in the triangular spandrel in the fourth bay between the Cumaean Sibyl and Isaiah. The spandrel is situated over the Hezekiah-Manasseh-Amon lunette.

All of the space in the foreground is occupied by the figure in profile of the woman seated on the ground. Behind her, there is the figure of a child and the head of an old man emerging from the shadows. A bright light, however, gives prominence to the woman’s green mantle with iridescent yellow shadows, her white shirt, and the violet scarf falling from her shoulder along her right arm, heightening the contrast with the figures behind.

In accordance with the lunette below, the figures represent Hezekiah as a child with his mother and his father Ahaz.

Ancestors of Christ: figures
Ancestors of Christ: figures by

Ancestors of Christ: figures

The figures are in the triangular spandrel in the sixth bay between Ezekiel and the Persian Sibyl. The spandrel is situated over the Rehoboam-Abijah lunette.

Michelangelo painted a family group in this lunette. The woman, seen in profile, is seated in the foreground, in an absorbed attitude, her chin resting on her hand; with her other arm she embraces her child. Behind her, the gray-haired head of a male figure emerges from the shadows.

Above, on each side of the ram’s skull, the bronze nudes no longer take the form of motionless, reclining figures, but are howling demons who struggle furiously in almost acrobatic positions in the restricted space enclosing them. Although their poses are perfectly symmetrical, their hair seems to be blown in the same direction, as if by a sudden gust of wind.

It is usually assumed that the male figure in the shadows represents Solomon, the father of Rehoboam.

Ancestors of Christ: figures
Ancestors of Christ: figures by

Ancestors of Christ: figures

The figures are in the triangular spandrel in the sixth bay between Daniel and the Cumaean Sibyl. The spandrel is situated over the Asa-Jehoshaphat-Joram lunette.

The field of the spandrel is almost entirely occupied by the figure of the sleeping woman, seated in the foreground on a white sack. The brightness of the colours of her robe contrast with the shadows in the background which shroud the figures of the man and child.

It is assumed that in the background Asa, the future king is consoling his father (a destroyer of idols) in pilgrim robe, while his mother (a worshipper of idols) is sleeping in the foreground.

Ancestors of Christ: figures
Ancestors of Christ: figures by

Ancestors of Christ: figures

The figures are in the triangular spandrel in the eighth bay between the Persian Sibyl and Jeremiah. The spandrel is above the Salmon-Boaz-Obed lunette.

The family group fits perfectly into the triangular field and appear, for once, closely linked by the interplay gestures and glances, focused on the woman’s activity. In accordance with the lunette below, it assumed that the boy is Salmon.

The bronze nudes in the fields above the cornice are depicted bent forward in an odd, uncomfortable pose, as if they were trying to peep upward.

Ancestors of Christ: figures
Ancestors of Christ: figures by

Ancestors of Christ: figures

The figures are in the triangular spandrel in the eighth bay between the Persian Sibyl and Jeremiah. The spandrel is above the Salmon-Boaz-Obed lunette.

The family group fits perfectly into the triangular field and appear, for once, closely linked by the interplay gestures and glances, focused on the woman’s activity. In accordance with the lunette below, it assumed that the boy is Salmon.

The bronze nudes in the fields above the cornice are depicted bent forward in an odd, uncomfortable pose, as if they were trying to peep upward.

Ancestors of Christ: figures
Ancestors of Christ: figures by

Ancestors of Christ: figures

The figures are in the triangular spandrel in the eighth bay between the Libyan Sibyl and Daniel. The spandrel is above the Jesse-David-Solomon lunette.

The absolute immobility of the enigmatic figure depicted frontally provides a triking contrast to the activity of the woman in the opposite spandrel. Placed precisely on the axis of the triangle, she appears to be deep in meditation and totally extraneous to the two figures - a man and a child - that may be discerned behind her in the darkness. In accordance with the lunette below, it can be assumed that Jesse as a child is depicted here together with his parents.

The bronze nudes, with their backs turned toward the viewer, seem to be looking upward, like those above the opposit spandrel.

Ancestors of Christ: figures (detail)
Ancestors of Christ: figures (detail) by

Ancestors of Christ: figures (detail)

The figures are in the triangular spandrel in the fourth bay between the Erythraean Sibyl and Ezekiel. This spandrel is over the Uzziah-Jotham-Ahaz lunette.

Together with the child leaning toward her breast, the woman kneeling in the foreground forms a pyramidal group with the axis slightly to the right of that of the triangle constituted by the spandrel. The space on the left is occupied a little further back by another seated figure who also clasps a child, while on the right there is a foreshortened representation of a large sack. The colours of the clothes, especially the woman’s pale pink mantle with iridescent green and yellow shadows, stand out against the gloomy, nocturnal background.

The figures are identified as Uzziah, the future king of Juda, his mother, his father Jotham, and one of his brothers.

Ancestors of Christ: figures (detail)
Ancestors of Christ: figures (detail) by

Ancestors of Christ: figures (detail)

The figures are in the triangular spandrel in the sixth bay between Ezekiel and the Persian Sibyl. The spandrel is situated over the Rehoboam-Abijah lunette.

Michelangelo painted a family group in this lunette. The woman, seen in profile, is seated in the foreground, in an absorbed attitude, her chin resting on her hand; with her other arm she embraces her child. Behind her, the gray-haired head of a male figure emerges from the shadows.

It is usually assumed that the scene represents the child Jesse with his parents.

Ancestors of Christ: figures (detail)
Ancestors of Christ: figures (detail) by

Ancestors of Christ: figures (detail)

It assumed that the boy represents Salmon.

Ancestors of Christ: figures (detail)
Ancestors of Christ: figures (detail) by

Ancestors of Christ: figures (detail)

The figures are in the triangular spandrel in the eighth bay between the Libyan Sibyl and Daniel. The spandrel is above the Jesse-David-Solomon lunette.

The absolute immobility of the enigmatic figure depicted frontally provides a triking contrast to the activity of the woman in the opposite spandrel. Placed precisely on the axis of the triangle, she appears to be deep in meditation and totally extraneous to the two figures - a man and a child - that may be discerned behind her in the darkness. In accordance with the lunette below, it can be assumed that Jesse as a child is depicted here together with his parents.

Andrea Quaratesi
Andrea Quaratesi by

Andrea Quaratesi

Angel with Candlestick
Angel with Candlestick by

Angel with Candlestick

Michelangelo made two small free-standing figures (St. Proculus and St Petronius) for the shrine of St. Dominic in San Domenico, and one angel candelabra for the altar of the chapel. Clearly, he had been looking at San Petronio’s major masterpiece, the great portal carved by Jacopo della Quercia nearly sixty years before. He adapted the older master’s directness of characterization, his admirable economy of gesture which concentrates the impact of the figure, and also the use of bulky draperies to give mass and weight.

The pair of this angel was executed by Niccolò dell’Arca.

Angel with Candlestick (detail)
Angel with Candlestick (detail) by

Angel with Candlestick (detail)

Archers Shooting at a Herm (recto)
Archers Shooting at a Herm (recto) by

Archers Shooting at a Herm (recto)

The red chalk drawing on the recto of this sheet depicts a group of nude figures which appear as archers aiming at a herm in the guise of a youth. Strangely, the bows are not depicted in the drawing. The drawing can be interpreted as an allegory. The verso contains several notes from which it can be derived that the Archers belongs to Michelangelo’s presentation drawings.

Asa - Jehoshaphat - Joram
Asa - Jehoshaphat - Joram by

Asa - Jehoshaphat - Joram

“Abijah begat Asa. Asa begat Jehoshapat. Jehoshapat begat Joram. Joram begat Uzziah.” (Matthew 1:7-8)

The lunette is between Daniel and the Cumaean Sibyl.

Asa - Jehoshaphat - Joram (detail)
Asa - Jehoshaphat - Joram (detail) by

Asa - Jehoshaphat - Joram (detail)

On the left, an emaciated old man, traditionally considered to be Jehoshaphat, is seen in full profile. He is sitting in an unusual pose - one leg is extended and the other bent, with the foot resting on the seat - and is engrossed in writing with a reed pen on a parchment placed on his raised knee. He is wearing a loose yellow mantle with bright red shadows that are greenish in the halftones, white trousers tied round the ankles (a style often associated with Orientals in painting) and rose shoes. A gray cap covers his bony head; with its hooked nose and large ears, it is thrust forward on a long neck, from which a prominent Adam’s apple protrudes.

Asa - Jehoshaphat - Joram (detail)
Asa - Jehoshaphat - Joram (detail) by

Asa - Jehoshaphat - Joram (detail)

On the right side, with descriptive and expressive naturalness, are displayed in the compact group, very similar to an allegory of Charity, of a mother with her three children. Clasping one of them, she turns toward another who, having climbed onto her back, puts his arm round her neck and kisses her on her cheek; the third puts his lips to her bare breast. The yellow gown with iridescent orange shadows echoes the dominant colour of the man’s cloak on the left side of the lunette.

Azor - Zadok
Azor - Zadok by

Azor - Zadok

“Eliakim begat Azor. Azor begat Zadok. Zadok begat Achim.” (Matthew 1:13-14)

This is the first lunette on the north wall.

The absence of information regarding the figures represented has thwarted any attempt to identify them. On the left a seated woman is shown indicating something outside the lunette to a boy (or a girl) who seems to be engrossed in writing or drawing and turns somewhat hesitantly. The woman’s pose, with its great naturalness and self-possession, is a variation on the twisted head, shoulders, and legs of the other figures.

On the other side of the lunette, seen sideways on, but with his head turned toward the viewer, sits a solitary mature man, his face furrowed by deep lines. Tightly wrapped in his yellow ochre mantle, from which only his head and an arm emerge, he appears to be prey to distressing thoughts. The body, modelled concisely with great plastic power by the interplay of light and shade, and the pattern of the folds of the mantle, stands out clearly against the background.

The number of figures present in this lunette is half that of the first lunettes painted by Michelangelo. This sense of isolation intensifies the expressive power of the figure of the pensive man, which some interpreted as being an imaginary self-portrait of the artist.

Azor - Zadok (detail)
Azor - Zadok (detail) by

Azor - Zadok (detail)

On the left a seated woman is shown indicating something outside the lunette to a boy (or a girl) who seems to be engrossed in writing or drawing and turns somewhat hesitantly. She is wearing a rose dress with lilac shadows, which is slipping off her shoulders; it is tied round the waist by a green sash bordered with yellow. The mantle folded back on her arm is deep yellow, while various colours are combined in her strange headdress.

Azor - Zadok (detail)
Azor - Zadok (detail) by

Azor - Zadok (detail)

On the right side of the lunette, seen sideways on, but with his head turned toward the viewer, sits a solitary mature man, his face furrowed by deep lines. Tightly wrapped in his yellow ochre mantle, from which only his head and an arm emerge, he appears to be prey to distressing thoughts. The body, modelled concisely with great plastic power by the interplay of light and shade, and the pattern of the folds of the mantle, stands out clearly against the background.

The number of figures present in this lunette is half that of the first lunettes painted by Michelangelo. This sense of isolation intensifies the expressive power of the figure of the pensive man, which some interpreted as being an imaginary self-portrait of the artist.

Bacchus
Bacchus by

Bacchus

Cardinal Raffaele Riario summoned Michelangelo to Rome in the summer of 1496 and ordered the figure of Bacchus. The statue was initially designed to compliment Riario’s collection of antiquities, but for unknown reasons it entered the collection of Jacopo Galli in 1497 and was exhibited in his garden among a group of antique fragments.

The Bacchus was undoubtedly conceived as an exercise in the Antique. As a garden statue, it is superficially untypical of Michelangelo, being a free-standing group, designed to be viewed in the round; most of Michelangelo’s surviving works were conceived for architectural settings with restricted viewpoints. The ‘pictorial’ finish of the Bacchus has been widely disliked, probably because the dull surface sheen of the god’s plump flesh, carefully differentiated from the curling goat-hair of the attendant satyr, is seen as suggestive of an unwholesome sensuality unworthy of the artist. The use of contrasting textures is not unusual in Michelangelo’s sculpture, however.

Bacchus
Bacchus by

Bacchus

Cardinal Raffaele Riario summoned Michelangelo to Rome in the summer of 1496 and ordered the figure of Bacchus. The statue was initially designed to compliment Riario’s collection of antiquities, but for unknown reasons it entered the collection of Jacopo Galli in 1497 and was exhibited in his garden among a group of antique fragments.

The Bacchus was undoubtedly conceived as an exercise in the Antique. As a garden statue, it is superficially untypical of Michelangelo, being a free-standing group, designed to be viewed in the round; most of Michelangelo’s surviving works were conceived for architectural settings with restricted viewpoints. The ‘pictorial’ finish of the Bacchus has been widely disliked, probably because the dull surface sheen of the god’s plump flesh, carefully differentiated from the curling goat-hair of the attendant satyr, is seen as suggestive of an unwholesome sensuality unworthy of the artist. The use of contrasting textures is not unusual in Michelangelo’s sculpture, however.

Bacchus
Bacchus by

Bacchus

Cardinal Raffaele Riario summoned Michelangelo to Rome in the summer of 1496 and ordered the figure of Bacchus. The statue was initially designed to compliment Riario’s collection of antiquities, but for unknown reasons it entered the collection of Jacopo Galli in 1497 and was exhibited in his garden among a group of antique fragments.

The Bacchus was undoubtedly conceived as an exercise in the Antique. As a garden statue, it is superficially untypical of Michelangelo, being a free-standing group, designed to be viewed in the round; most of Michelangelo’s surviving works were conceived for architectural settings with restricted viewpoints. The ‘pictorial’ finish of the Bacchus has been widely disliked, probably because the dull surface sheen of the god’s plump flesh, carefully differentiated from the curling goat-hair of the attendant satyr, is seen as suggestive of an unwholesome sensuality unworthy of the artist. The use of contrasting textures is not unusual in Michelangelo’s sculpture, however.

Bacchus
Bacchus by

Bacchus

At the age of 21 Michelangelo went to Rome for the first time. We still possess two of the works he created in this period (Bacchus and Pietà); others must have been lost for he spent five years there.

The statue of Bacchus was commissioned by the banker Jacopo Galli for his garden and he wanted it fashioned after the models of the ancients. The body of this drunken and staggering god gives an impression of both youthfulness and of femininity. Vasari says that this strange blending of effects is the characteristic of the Greek god Dionysus. But in Michelangelo’s experience, sensuality of such a divine nature has a drawback for man: in his left hand the god holds with indifference a lionsksin, the symbol of death, and a bunch of grapes, the symbol of life, from which a Faun is feeding. Thus we are brought to realize, in a sudden way, what significance this miracle of pure sensuality has for man: living only for a short while he will find himself in the position of the faun, caught in the grasp of death, the lionskin.

The statue was transferred to Florence in 1572.

Bacchus (detail)
Bacchus (detail) by

Bacchus (detail)

Although this sculpture is composed only of bodies and a tree stump, the young sculptor experiments to see how far the small companion of the wine god can hide behind the larger figure. This playful aspect is intensified by the detailed face of the satyr with the grapes. Michelangelo’s first work in Rome shows the intensity with which still-life-like motifs could imbue his otherwise so often harsh work.

Battle
Battle by

Battle

The Battle is the second piece of Michelangelo. It was carved in white Carrara marble for Lorenzo de’ Medici and left unfinished at his death. Variously identified as the Battle of the Cantaurs and the Rape of Dejaniera or Battle of Hercules and the Centaurs, it reflects Michelangelo’s study of late Roman sarcophagi, Bertoldo, the Pisani and Pollaiolo.

Suggested listening (streaming mp3, 12 minutes):

Heinrich Ignaz Franz von Biber: The Battle, suite

Battle
Battle by

Battle

The Battle is the second piece of Michelangelo. It was carved in white Carrara marble for Lorenzo de’ Medici and left unfinished at his death. Variously identified as the Battle of the Cantaurs and the Rape of Dejaniera or Battle of Hercules and the Centaurs, it reflects Michelangelo’s study of late Roman sarcophagi, Bertoldo, the Pisani and Pollaiolo.

Suggested listening (streaming mp3, 12 minutes):

Heinrich Ignaz Franz von Biber: The Battle, suite

Battle Scene
Battle Scene by

Battle Scene

This sketch shows a horse skirmish intended for the Battle of Cascina.

Battle of Cascina (central section)
Battle of Cascina (central section) by

Battle of Cascina (central section)

In the autumn of 1504 Michelangelo was given the commission to paint a battle scene for the Palazzo della Signoria as a companion piece to Leonardo’s Battle of Anghiari. This grand project came to nothing: the cartoon was finished - at least in part - by February 1505, but the urgent summons from Pope Julius II prevented Michelangelo from continuing with the work, for which only some drawings survived.

This picture shows the centwal section of the cartoon copied by Bastiano (Aristotile) Sangallo.

Suggested listening (streaming mp3, 12 minutes):

Heinrich Ignaz Franz von Biber: The Battle, suite

Bearded Head in Profile (recto)
Bearded Head in Profile (recto) by

Bearded Head in Profile (recto)

The facial features of the bearded head represented on this sheet are related to the head of Prophet Zechariah, whom Michelangelo painted on the narrow side of the ceiling, directly above the main entrance of the Sistine Chapel. The face in the drawing is roughly outlined and rendered in an extremely economical manner with a few parallel lines.

The studies of knee joints and legs on both sides of the sheet are also related to the ceiling frescoes.

Bronze nudes
Bronze nudes by

Bronze nudes

The bronze-coloured male nudes, on either side of a ram’s skull, recline on the cornice of the pendentive in which the bible story of Judith and Holofernes is represented. On the other hand, the pairs of putti below the projection of the cornice delimiting the central part of the vault simulate groups sculpted in stone. They are placed, respectively, at the sides of the throne of the Delphic Sibyl (those on the left) and the prophet Zechariah (those in the right).

Bronze nudes
Bronze nudes by

Bronze nudes

Two bronze-coloured male nudes also recline on the cornice of the pendentive representing David and Goliath, while the pairs of putti are placed, respectively, at the sides of the thrones of the prophet Zechariah and Joel. Mirror symmetry is found in the poses of each pair of bronze male nudes, and also of the two pairs of putti flanking the thrones of each seer.

Bronze nudes
Bronze nudes by

Bronze nudes

In the corners of the ceiling, the shape of the narrow fields reserved for the bronze nudes, at the sides of the ram’s skull, makes the arrangement of the figures more difficult. Here the reclining figures, above the Punishment of Haman, each raise an arm and a leg toward the small fictive pilasters on which pairs of putti are depicted in intertwined postures.

Bronze nudes
Bronze nudes by

Bronze nudes

Leaning on arms extended behind them, the two bronze nudes above The Brazen Serpent, arranged symmetrically, bend their backs and legs as if they were huddling in the limited space allotted to them. On the face of the figure on the left, which is in the light, an expression of suffering is evident.

Brutus
Brutus by

Brutus

This is Michelangelo’s last work of primarily political significance. The bust of Brutus was fashioned for Cardinal Niccolò Ridolfi, who, in 1530, had fled Florence for Rome like many other Florentines; although Michelangelo might well have been thinking of Lorenzino Medici, the well-known “Modern Brutus” who had killed Duke Alessandro de’ Medici in 1537, this is clearly an idealized portrait of the patron. In the head, which shows strength of will in the way it is turned to the right, a cold tranquillity and great energy blend fascinatingly with hatred, wrath and bitter contempt.

Brutus
Brutus by

Brutus

The observer is confronted with massive broad shoulders under a classical cape. The form energetically turns its head into a sharp profile, thereby evoking classical associations, whereas the observer is imbued with the sensation that the form is somewhat clumsy when walking around it.

Brutus (detail)
Brutus (detail) by

Brutus (detail)

During the second half of the 1540s Michelangelo began the Brutus, his last commissioned sculpture, for Cardinal Niccolò Ridolfi.

The Brutus, commissioned by a Medici opponent as a symbol of Republican virtue, was acquired after Michelangelo’s death by the Grand Duke of Tuscany, Francesco I. In the Medici collections it was exhibited accompanied by a Latin verse, which claimed: ‘As the sculptor carved the portrait of Brutus from the marble, he remembered his crime, and broke off’. Celebration of the tyrant-slayer was thus subverted, and Michelangelo’s failure to complete the work was represented as a praiseworthy moral act.

The bust was finished by Tiberio Calcagni before the death of Cardinal Ridolfi in 1550.

Bust of a Warrior, and a Head in Profile
Bust of a Warrior, and a Head in Profile by

Bust of a Warrior, and a Head in Profile

The present drawing, trimmed diagonally at the top and bottom on the left side, was likely created in preparation for the Battle of Cascina.

Bust of a Young Man (recto)
Bust of a Young Man (recto) by

Bust of a Young Man (recto)

This impressive portrait is one of Michelangelo’s few extant portrait drawings in which rather unattractive facial features are overstated, making them slightly bizarre in a portrayal that verges on a caricature. The intended purpose of the portrait, and the dating are subject of scholarly debate.

On the verso of the sheet, a man lifting a boar is drawn in red chalk.

Bust of the Virgin in Profile, the Child Reclining on a Cushion
Bust of the Virgin in Profile, the Child Reclining on a Cushion by

Bust of the Virgin in Profile, the Child Reclining on a Cushion

On this densely filled sheet, there are some additional figural motives, not related to the main subject, the Virgin and Child. Although some scholars have variously considered it to be either a workshop product, by the Master of the Manchester Madonna, or by Benvenuto Cellini, it is definitely one of Michelangelo’s study sheets.

Candelabrum Pedestal
Candelabrum Pedestal by

Candelabrum Pedestal

Two candelabra adorn the altar, one decorated with the pelican to symbolize sacrifice and the other with the phoenix to represent the resurrection of Christ. The arresting differences afforded by the various perspectives of the sculptures can be best experienced from the position of the priest, who stood behind the altar according to the old Christian tradition. (The candelabrum on the right was renewed in the eighteenth century.)

Capitoline Hill
Capitoline Hill by

Capitoline Hill

This drawing (after Etienne Dup�rac) shows a reconstruction of Michelangelo’s project. The pavement, although apparently planned by Michelangelo, was not laid until 1940 when Mussolini recognized the historical importance of the Capitoline as a symbol of governance.

Capitoline Hill
Capitoline Hill by

Capitoline Hill

Michelangelo set the seal on his plan by removing the equestrian statue of Marcus Aurelius, which the Romans had long believed to be Constantine the Great, from the Lateran, and placing it on a pedestal of his design in the centre of the Capitoline hill.

As emblem of the Imperial power of Rome, the Caesar holding sway over a limitless area rises from the centre of the sun, whose twelve rays branch out into a linear pattern of multiple dimensions; by means of intersecting lines six times twelve concentric fields are obtained. It is clear that in conjunction with the twelve-pointed sun upon which he rides, they represent the planets (which designation includes sun and moon), passing through the twelve mansions of the Zodiac. As an assiduous reader of the Divine Comedy Michelangelo may have come by these ideas, familiar to other medieval minds, D�rer among them. The monarchic idea, too, derives from Dante. The whole design fits into an ellipse which represents the earthly correspondence to the divine sphere, but it is an oval which contains two focal points because dualism in the world had displaced the true centre. It is no accident or artist’s whim that the number seven is the key theme of the Capitol. It is found in the mystical speculation of all ages.

Ceiling of the Medici Chapel
Ceiling of the Medici Chapel by

Ceiling of the Medici Chapel

Christ Crucified between the Virgin and St John
Christ Crucified between the Virgin and St John by

Christ Crucified between the Virgin and St John

Christ in Limbo
Christ in Limbo by

Christ in Limbo

The drawings on this sheet are related to Sebastiano del Piombo’s Christ Descends into Limbo, showing Christ with the banner of the cross standing in front of the gate of hell. Christ’s posture is a mirror image of that in the painting. The present study is the only one in which we know for certain that Michelangelo occupied himself with this compositional motif.

Sebastiano came to Rome in 1511 and soon became friends with Michelangelo, who took him under his wing. Michelangelo admired Sebastiano’s coloration and made drafts for the paintings of his friend, who could not compete with the master with regard to compositional and heroic figural concepts.

Christ on the Cross
Christ on the Cross by

Christ on the Cross

This is a study for a painting commissioned by Vittoria Colonna in 1545. The painting, now lost, is known from copies. This drawing is the most significant among the existing studies.

Vasari commented the drawing: ‘One sees the body not abandoned to fall like dead, but as if living, through bitter suffering arousing itself and writhing.’

Suggested listening (streaming mp3, 11 minutes):

Georges de la Hele: Missa “Nigra sum”

Christ on the Cross with the Virgin and St John
Christ on the Cross with the Virgin and St John by

Christ on the Cross with the Virgin and St John

The six drawings of Crucifixions, depicting Christ on the cross between the Virgin and Saint John, the drawings Michelangelo did for his own personal use, show us better than any of his other works something of the artist’s development during his last years. The present Crucifixion is probably the final drawing in the series, although it cannot be established with absolute certainty. It does, in any case, differ with regard to both form and content from the other Crucifixion scenes of the artist’s last period, in which the mourners are depicted completely isolated, lonely, and abandoned. In the present drawing, on the other hand, Virgin Mary is tenderly nestled against the side of Christ, while St John finds protection and reassurance beneath the Cross because of Christ’s close proximity. In no other Crucifixion scene by Michelangelo do mortals enter into such a close relationship with Christ.

The present drawing shows us, once again, those same ideas which had tormented the artist during his work on the Pietà Rondanini: “Oh! Flesh, Blood and Wood, supreme pain, Through you must I suffer my agony.” These lines, which the artist had written at the age of 57, seem to convey the dominant feeling in the Madonna and Saint John, gathered around the Cross. Fear and pain have drawn the Madonna to Christ’s body, while St John turns towards Him in supplication, with one arm around the Cross. In this female figure there is nothing of the Mother of God represented in his 1499 Pietà, nor does the Evangelist recall anything of the 1505 St Matthew. Nowhere are the changes of this half century so clearly demonstrated as in the life and work of Michelangelo Buonarroti.

The elementary human feelings common to all mankind that Michelangelo reflects in his depictions of Christ’s death are unique in his oeuvre of drawings. In their exceptional depth and intensity they are comparable to the Requiem that Mozart would compose more than two hundred years later when confronted with his own imminent death.

Suggested listening (streaming mp3, 8 minutes):

Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart: Requiem K 626: Dies irae

Christ on the Cross with the Virgin and St John
Christ on the Cross with the Virgin and St John by

Christ on the Cross with the Virgin and St John

This Crucifixion is part of a series of large-format drawings on the subject that are stylistically related and were probably created in close succession during Michelangelo’s last creative period. They share in common - among other features - the arrangement on parallel pictorial planes of the figures, whose bodies are enclosed in a block-like manner and strictly separated from one another. They depict the dead body of Christ on the Cross, in most cases with the Virgin and St John the Evangelist at his feet. The drawings on this subject are an overwhelming testament to Michelangelo’s meditations on the suffering, death, and resurrection of Christ, a theme with which the artist deeply concerned himself in his late creative period in the face of his own death.

The exact chronology of these drawings is not established.

Christ on the Cross with the Virgin and St John (recto)
Christ on the Cross with the Virgin and St John (recto) by

Christ on the Cross with the Virgin and St John (recto)

This Crucifixion is part of a series of large-format drawings on the subject that are stylistically related and were probably created in close succession during Michelangelo’s last creative period. They share in common - among other features - the arrangement on parallel pictorial planes of the figures, whose bodies are enclosed in a block-like manner and strictly separated from one another.

On the verso of the sheet a sketch of a left leg in frontal view can be found.

Cleopatra (recto)
Cleopatra (recto) by

Cleopatra (recto)

This highly decorative, virtuoso drawing was one of a series of gifts for Tommaso de’ Cavalieri, a young artist whom Michelangelo wished to teach and of whom he was deeply fond. The elder painters’s celebrated draftsmanship is visible in the extreme twist of head and neck, known as ‘serpentinata’ - perhaps a play on words, given the fatal, coiling asp.

In many of his drawings Michelangelo created ideal portraits of women, in which he frequently emphasized the beauty of the female figures with imaginative hair styles plaited with scarves, other fabrics, or pieces of jewellery and adorned with exquisite headdresses and similar accessories. These portraits were in keeping with Florentine traditions, influenced by the works of Sandro Botticelli, Antonio del Pollaiuolo, Leonardo da Vinci, and Piero di Cosimo.

The verso of the sheet contains a black chalk study for Cleopatra.

Creation of Adam
Creation of Adam by

Creation of Adam

The fourth scene in the chronological order of the narrative, the Creation of Adam, is depicted in the large field of the vault of the sixth bay, between the triangular spandrels.

Michelangelo’s organization of the Sistine ceiling frescos represents perhaps the most complex composition in Western art. The space contains an intricate pseudo structure of architecture that frames the sculpture-like forms. Out of the nine narrative scenes depicting events from Genesis, the most sublime scene is this “Creation of Adam,” in which his new vision of humanity attains pictural form.

It is scarcely possible to put into words the impressions roused by this marvellous painting; it is as though current passed from the painted scene to the beholder, who often feels that he is assisting at a hallowed world-shaking event. Michelangelo experiences the stages of creation within himself, retracing the way to the divine source by the double path of religion and of art. Now that, inspired by God, he has given form to Eve, elliptical and parabolic shapes begin to multiply; the number of orbits with two focal points increase. These were copied blindly during the following two centuries and became a decorative commonplace.

Precisely here, where man the microcosm and incarnate Word made in the divine image, the Adam Kadmon of Cabalistic doctrine, issues from the hand of God as the fingers of the Father and the son touch in a loving gesture, it is significant and convincing that the Eternal is circumscribed by the ellipse (symbolizing the ‘cosmic egg’) of his celestial mantle and angelic spirits, while Adam forms only an incomplete oval. Through the extended hands and arms the creative flash passes from one orbit to the other. Love radiates from the face of God and from the face of man. God wills his child to be no less than himself. As if to confirm this, a marvellous being looks out from among the host of spirits that bear the Father on their wings; a genius of love encircled by the left arm of the Creator. This figure has intrigued commentators from the beginning and has been variously interpreted as the uncreated Eve, or Sophia, divine wisdom. Be that as it may, this figure undoubtedly signifies beatific rapture.

Creation of Adam
Creation of Adam by

Creation of Adam

Seen against an indistinct natural background that is only just hinted at, as if it were the dawn of the world, the youthful, athletic figure reclining on a grassy slope, almost on the edge of an abyss, seems as if he is about to rise from the ground. He holds out his arm toward that of the Lord, who, borne aloft amidst a flight of angels, stands out brightly against the shell of shadow of his huge purple mantle. The remarkable invention of the outstretched arm and the forefingers about to meet becomes a metaphor for the vital energy that passes from the Creator to the creature fashioned in his image, awakwening his heroic vigor.

Creation of Adam (detail)
Creation of Adam (detail) by

Creation of Adam (detail)

The body of Adam is rendered with great softness with passages of chiaroscuro, but also with strong sculptural emphasis.

Vasari describes Adam as “a figure whose beauty, pose and contours are of such a quality that he seems newly created by his Supreme and First Creator rather by the brush and design of a mere mortal.”

Creation of Adam (detail)
Creation of Adam (detail) by

Creation of Adam (detail)

The Lord, borne aloft amidst a flight of angels, stands out brightly against the shell of shadow of his huge purple mantle.

Creation of Adam (detail)
Creation of Adam (detail) by

Creation of Adam (detail)

The adolescent face of Adam, seen in profile, still lacking a definite expression, contrasts with the mature, intensely energetic one of the Lord, with his grey hair and long beard streaming in the air.

Creation of Adam (detail)
Creation of Adam (detail) by

Creation of Adam (detail)

The adolescent face of Adam, seen in profile, still lacking a definite expression, contrasts with the mature, intensely energetic one of the Lord, with his grey hair and long beard streaming in the air.

Creation of Eve
Creation of Eve by

Creation of Eve

In response to the gesture and intense gaze of the Creator, Eve appears to rise from the rocks behind Adam rather than from his body, extending her joint hands. The bodies of the couple appear to be those of adolescents, in contrast to those depicted in the scene of the Fall and Expulsion. The figure of the Lord, wrapped in a voluminous violet mantle that only allows a glimpse of the red tunic he wears in the other scenes of the Creation, draws on an iconographic tradition dating back to Giotto and Masaccio, from which it is differentiated, however, by the blond hair and beard framing the face.

The Creation of Woman is a design cast in simple, powerful form that contains a certain demonic element. The God and Demiurge, as conceived in the earlier medieval tradition, fills the space between heaven and earth as if about to erupt out of it, lifting his arms with an incantatory gesture and a supernatural air. More is indicated here than mere physical creation: it is the conception of the female mirror-image drawn forth from the sleeping Adam, who is fettered to a stunted tree shaped like the Staurus, the Egyptian cross. Is he the archetypal son destined to become the Mediator and endure the Passion? The composition forms a right-angled triangle with Adam as the horizontal and God the Father the vertical element, and Eve, in an attitude of adoration, striving towards the hand of God as a diagonal hypotenuse. Theirs is a harmonious Pythagorean unity of spirits prior to their separation. This astounding fresco dominating the centre of the entire vault links Ezekiel and the Sibyl of Cumae, thus underlining the importance of the grand design of the law of polarity!

Creation of Eve (detail)
Creation of Eve (detail) by

Creation of Eve (detail)

The detail shows the sleeping Adam.

Creation of Eve (detail)
Creation of Eve (detail) by

Creation of Eve (detail)

In response to the gesture and intense gaze of the Creator, Eve appears to rise from the rocks behind Adam rather than from his body, extending her joint hands.

Creation of Eve (with ignudi and medallions)
Creation of Eve (with ignudi and medallions) by

Creation of Eve (with ignudi and medallions)

The fifth scene in the chronological order of the narrative, The Creation of Eve, is depicted in the centre of the vault of the fifth bay, between two pairs of ignudi with medallions. Michelangelo painted this scene immediately beyond the screen that originally divided the interior of the chapel into two almost equal parts. Proceeding from the entrance of the chapel towards the altar, the figure of the Lord appears for the first time in the Creation of Eve. He is also present in all the following scenes. The central position of this scene creates a further division in the nine scenes in the ceiling. This is in addition to the pattern created by the alteration of larger and smaller panels, and the arrangement by subject; three stories of the Creation of the world, three of Adam and Eve, and three of Noah, presented as the second Adam, saved from the flood, through the flood, seen as the symbol of the baptism.

In the four ignudi who hold the yellow ribbons interwoven with the bronze-coloured medallions, the use of contrapposta with a variety of gestures and poses has now been replaced the symmetrical arrangement of figures. The relationship between the figures, placed opposite each other in pairs, is based on increasingly free and complex rhythmical correspondences, with rotating movements and pronounced bendings of the limbs.

The subjects of the scenes painted on the bronze-coloured medallions are a matter of debate: the one surmounting the figure of the prophet Ezekiel (at the left) might represent the Destruction of the Tribe of Ahab, Followers of Baal, according to a different interpretation, the Death of Nicanor; the one above the Cumaean Sibyl (at the right) depicts either David before the prophet Nathan, or Alexander before the High Priest of Jerusalem.

Creation of the Sun, Moon, and Plants
Creation of the Sun, Moon, and Plants by

Creation of the Sun, Moon, and Plants

The second scene in the chronological order of the narrative, the Creation of the Sun, Moon, and Plants, is depicted in the large field of the vault of the eighth bay, between the triangular spandrels.

In this scene the figure of the Lord appears twice: on the right, as he is about to give shape, with his outstretched arms, to the incandescent disk of the sun and the cold one of the moon; and, on the other side, as, with an imperious gesture, he summons forth tufts of grass and the first bushes from the bare earth. The scene is divided unequally: the great disk of the sun - the only element of colour that stands out clearly from the more subdued tones of the clothes, flesh, and the greyish white background of the sky - is to the left of the central axis of the field, and the whole of the right part is dominated by the figure of the Creator who, surrounded by four children, moves impetuously toward the viewer.

On the left, in a more restricted field, and further back from the picture plane, the Creator is depicted once again - notably foreshortened and seen from behind - as he heads toward the earth, going away from the foreground. Together with the strong contrasts of light and shade, the movement in opposite directions of the two figures heightens the dynamic tension of the scene and conveys a sense of immediacy.

Creation of the Sun, Moon, and Plants (detail)
Creation of the Sun, Moon, and Plants (detail) by

Creation of the Sun, Moon, and Plants (detail)

On the penultimate fresco of the Creation of the Sun, the Moon and the Plants it becomes clear that Michelangelo increasingly discarded iconographic and symbolic tradition. In the Creation of Woman, the Almighty is still standing upright in the 15th-century manner, but here the artist followed his own imagination. This, of course, entailed the danger of a lapse into obscurity and theatrical illusionism; to introduce a simple device from an early illuminated version of the Gospels into a composition treated in a more complex manner was bound to result in an impure style. On this fresco, God the Creator moving above the earth appears twice, once descending with a sweeping rhetorical gesture, and again wrathfully departing. The effect of this grandiose conception is not altogether satisfying. It is forced and lacking in the harmony that Michelangelo usually achieved with substance shown in a state of turmoil. The idea of uniting the third and fourth day of creation in a single composition was not a felicitous one.

Creation of the Sun, Moon, and Plants (detail)
Creation of the Sun, Moon, and Plants (detail) by

Creation of the Sun, Moon, and Plants (detail)

On the left, in a more restricted field, and further back from the picture plane, the Creator is depicted once again - notably foreshortened and seen from behind - as he heads toward the earth, going away from the foreground. Together with the strong contrasts of light and shade, the movement in opposite directions of the two figures heightens the dynamic tension of the scene and conveys a sense of immediacy.

Creation of the Sun, Moon, and Plants (detail)
Creation of the Sun, Moon, and Plants (detail) by

Creation of the Sun, Moon, and Plants (detail)

Creation of the Sun, Moon, and Plants (detail)
Creation of the Sun, Moon, and Plants (detail) by

Creation of the Sun, Moon, and Plants (detail)

The right part of the scene is dominated by the figure of the Creator who, surrounded by four children, moves impetuously toward the viewer.

Crouching Boy
Crouching Boy by

Crouching Boy

The Crouching Boy was thought to be chiseled for the Medici Chapel in San Lorenzo, Florence. The memorial ensemble, conceived as an allegory of the inexorable march of time, was not completed in accordance with the original project. The statue of a boy may have been made for one of the niches in a tomb. The sculpture remains unfinished permitting an examination of Michelangelo’s vigorous handling of marble.

Crouching Boy
Crouching Boy by

Crouching Boy

The Crouching Boy was thought to be chiseled for the Medici Chapel in San Lorenzo, Florence. The memorial ensemble, conceived as an allegory of the inexorable march of time, was not completed in accordance with the original project. The statue of a boy may have been made for one of the niches in a tomb. The sculpture remains unfinished permitting an examination of Michelangelo’s vigorous handling of marble.

Crouching Boy
Crouching Boy by

Crouching Boy

The subject is identified in the literature as a mourning genius or, less plausibly, as a tired warrior.

Crouching Boy
Crouching Boy by

Crouching Boy

The Crouching Boy was thought to be chiseled for the Medici Chapel in San Lorenzo, Florence. The memorial ensemble, conceived as an allegory of the inexorable march of time, was not completed in accordance with the original project. The statue of a boy may have been made for one of the niches in a tomb. The sculpture remains unfinished permitting an examination of Michelangelo’s vigorous handling of marble.

Crucified Christ with Mary and John
Crucified Christ with Mary and John by

Crucified Christ with Mary and John

This drawing comes from a series in which Michelangelo towards the end of his life sought to depict the Crucified Christ. They might have been viewed as a preparation of a sculpture. The position of Christ’s head is not yet clear and the other figures (presumably Mary and John) only appear in a rough state as they are stricken with grief.

Crucifix
Crucifix by

Crucifix

Serious considerations have lead art historians to identify this work found in the sacristy of Santo Spirito with the wooden cross mentioned by early writers as having been carved by Michelangelo in 1492 for the prior of that church. The way the head and legs are treated in contrapposto suggests a search for classical harmony. The extremely soft modelling of Christ, his tender facial expression, and the complex anatomical structure have no counterpart in any of Michelangelo’s youthful works, and some critics have reservations about its attribution to that artist.

Suggested listening (streaming mp3, 3 minutes):

Guillaume Dufay: Hymn for Easter

Daniel
Daniel by

Daniel

If Ezekiel saw the beginning and the origin of creation, the first emanation of the Godhead, the youthful Titan Daniel knows of ultimate things and of the Judgment which Michelangelo was to paint much later above the altar of the Sistine Chapel. Assisted by his genius half hidden in his lilac mantle, the man who lived unharmed in a lion’s den silently sets down in the Book of Life what he has seen. The seer’s hand with the foreshortened arm expresses quiet dedication to his task. And it should be said here that Michelangelo’s vaunted foreshortening perspectives were never feats of artistic bravado, as was the case with his countless imitators, but always met a psychological necessity or expressed some truth; they are therefore aesthetically satisfying, never grotesque as so often in Baroque art.

Daniel (detail)
Daniel (detail) by

Daniel (detail)

The figure of the prophet Daniel, engrossed in reading and writing, but with the signs of deep interior anxiety, was seriously damaged by water seepage and subsequent heavy retouching. The recent restoration has revived the delicate colour accords of the clothes.

Daniel (detail)
Daniel (detail) by

Daniel (detail)

David
David by

David

In 1501 Michelangelo was commissioned to create the David by the Arte della Lana (Guild of Wool Merchant), who were responsible for the upkeep and the decoration of the Cathedral in Florence. For this purpose, he was given a block of marble which Agostino di Duccio had already attempted to fashion forty years previously, perhaps with the same subject in mind.

Michelangelo breaks away from the traditional way of representing David. He does not present us with the winner, the giant’s head at his feet and the powerful sword in his hand, but portrays the youth in the phase immediately preceding the battle: perhaps he has caught him just in the moment when he has heard that his people are hesitating, and he sees Goliath jeering and mocking them. The artist places him in the most perfect “ contraposto”, as in the most beautiful Greek representations of heroes. The right-hand side of the statue is smooth and composed while the left-side, from the outstretched foot all the way up to the disheveled hair is openly active and dynamic. The muscles and the tendons are developed only to the point where they can still be interpreted as the perfect instrument for a strong will, and not to the point of becoming individual self-governing forms.

Once the statue was completed, a committee of the highest ranking citizens and artists decided that it must be placed in the main square of the town, in front of the Palazzo Vecchio, the Town Hall. It was the first time since antiquity that a large statue of a nude was to be exhibited in a public place. This was only allowed thanks to the action of two forces, which by a fortunate chance complemented each other: the force of an artist able to create, for a political community, the symbol of its highest political ideals, and, on the other hand, that of a community, which understood the power of this symbol. “Strength” and “Wrath” were the two most important virtues, characteristic of the ancient patron of the city Hercules. Both these qualities, passionate strength and wrath, were embodied in the statue of David.

Suggested listening (streaming mp3, 11 minutes):

Johann Kuhnau: The Fight between David and Goliath (No. 1 of the 6 Stories from the Bible illustrated in music)

David
David by

David

The David is the first of Michelangelo’s surviving depictions of the heroic male nude in which the entire emotional charge is carried by the articulation and twist of the body and limbs against the head. Stripped of all attributes but the minimal sling, this David carries no sword, and not even the head of Goliath distracts from his stark nudity. The figure’s authority seems to stem from the swing of the thorax, within which is a dramatic play of intercostal and abdominal muscles, stretched on the left, compressed on the right. But other details - the highly particularized right hand, for example, large, veined, quite unideal - suggest latent power in a figure apparently at rest. In a formal sense, the David is a classicizing work recalling the Dioscuri (Rome, Quirinale) or nudes found on Roman sarcophagi, perhaps mediated by Nicola Pisano’s Herculean figure of Fortitude (Pisa, Baptistery, pulpit). Conceptually, however, it was unprecedented.

David (detail)
David (detail) by
David (detail)
David (detail) by

David (detail)

The highly particularized right hand, large, veined, quite unideal, suggest latent power in a figure apparently at rest.

David (detail)
David (detail) by
David (detail)
David (detail) by

David (detail)

David’s oblique gaze and determined frown embody the ‘terribilità’ characteristic of all Michelangelo’s work.

David (detail)
David (detail) by

David (detail)

David’s oblique gaze and determined frown embody the ‘terribilità’ characteristic of all Michelangelo’s work.

David (rear view)
David (rear view) by

David (rear view)

Feedback